It sorta makes sense to me that the Quicksync block of a 620 and 630 is probably the same (Like with what Hat said), because they are the same generation product, so if the clock is the same, probably the performance is the same? They both have Quicksync, bot there's not a lot of indication how Quicksync performs on each one. Well, that's still the same problem, comparing the GPU, it's still just identified as a feature that a GPU has or doesn't have.
For example, you want to be comparing Intel® UHD Graphics 630 vs. Its the Intel processor's on-board GPU that drives the application's performance. Anyone know the answer on that one?Įnd goal is deciding if I can go real low end on the CPU (Atom or i3) and still do what I want or not, since for me, I'm trying to make hardware transcoding do all the heavy lifting. Related to that, does core count affect capacity? I always thought it was a per-CPU package of silicon, but if it's per-core, that would imply more cores=more capacity. If they all ran the same clock speed(which I'm assuming influences Quicksync performance), would they all be able to handle in hardware pretty much the same number of Quicksync operations? So when I say capacity, I mean, take an Atom or i3 of the same generation of an i5 or i7. Does that mean that capacity is pretty much the same across CPUs if the generation is the same?
It's listed in Ark as just kind of a toggle or a revision. One thing I've had trouble determining is how much Quicksync is affected by the CPU it's part of. I'm looking at getting a NUC or something to move my Plex server to, and I've been trying to figure out the CPU I want to get.